Hi
I have often come across questions where an Indian Hindu want divorce from his spouse due to his impotency,ie,inability to have sex.
I want to ask lawyers,In India,a person is usually a virgin before marriage.So he has sex for the 1st time only after marriage.Even if he is discovered to be impotent after marriage,shud the courts really give divorce to the immature & selfish partner?Because the person cannot know of his impotency b4 marriage.
Otherwise all Indians shud get the licence to have sex b4 marrige in order to confirm that they are capable of having sex.
Secondly,impotency is curable.So instead of the courts giving the partner divorce & in turn humiliate his spouse,shud this law not be banned?Instead they shud order the person to take his spouse for treatment.
Wud the courts take the same stand if the person wants a divorce because of his partner’s pneumonia,diabetes,allergy etc?In such a situation,then the courts will term this as cruelty.
On one hand sexologists are licensed by the govt. to counsel couples & heal sexual disorders.On the other hand,this very govt. does not allow an impotent to continue the marriage………Why this hypocrisy?
So sexologists shud be banned from practising.Then only this weird law makes sense.
What do the lawyers have to say on this?
No comments:
Post a Comment